lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110630124333.GA9727@linux-mips.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:43:33 +0100
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	florian@...ux-mips.org, Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SB16 build error.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:38:20PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> > In userland an empty definition will be used for _IOC_TYPECHECK so there
> > won't be an error.  So userland already is already using the existing
> > value for SNDRV_SB_CSP_IOCTL_LOAD_CODE ...
> 
> Right.  It has an invalid direction (3), but apps won't care such
> details anyway.
> 
> > With a crude hack like
> > 
> > #define SNDRV_SB_CSP_IOCTL_LOAD_CODE				\
> > 	_IOC(_IOC_WRITE,'H', 0x11, sizeof(struct snd_sb_csp_microcode))
> > 
> > error checking can be bypassed and all will be fine as long as the
> > resulting value doesn't result in in a a duplicate case value - which it
> > doesn't, at least not in my testing.
> > 
> > Should work but isn't nice.
> 
> Indeed.  But which is uglier is hard to answer :)
> 
> If you are fine with the hacked ioctl number above, I can put it
> with some comments.  This won't break anything, at least.

Go ahead then and yes, this really deserves a comment.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ