[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106301454.16530.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:54:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, florian@...ux-mips.org,
Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SB16 build error.
On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> #define SNDRV_SB_CSP_IOCTL_LOAD_CODE \
> _IOC(_IOC_WRITE,'H', 0x11, sizeof(struct snd_sb_csp_microcode))
>
> error checking can be bypassed and all will be fine as long as the
> resulting value doesn't result in in a a duplicate case value - which it
> doesn't, at least not in my testing.
>
> Should work but isn't nice.
Right. It's probably the best we can do. I think we added a few similar
definitions when we originally introduce _IOC_TYPECHECK. The idea was
never to break existing code, but rather to avoid merging new drivers that
use inconsistent ioctl command numbers.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists