[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E0C80B8.7030006@atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:57:12 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
CC: lrg@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: wm8731: rework power management
Le 29/06/2011 19:11, Mark Brown :
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:00:15PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
> Don't mix multiple changes into a single patch! There's no perceptible
> code overlap between these so I don't understand why you've merged them,
> it just makes review harder and the changelog less descriptive.
Ok.
>> - preserve crystal oscillator across suspend/resume sequence:
>> enabled by default, it should be kept enabled on resume.
>
> This isn't what your code does...
>
>> snd_soc_write(codec, WM8731_ACTIVE, 0x0);
>> - snd_soc_write(codec, WM8731_PWR, 0xffff);
>> + /* standby: keep crystal oscillator enabled */
>> + snd_soc_write(codec, WM8731_PWR, 0x00df);
>
> This doesn't keep the crystal oscillator enabled, this forces it on in
> suspend (and without looking at the datasheet it also changes way more
> than the one register bit I'd expect to be changed). If the system
> isn't using the oscillator then that's not good.
>
> I'd expect to see a change to using snd_soc_update_bits() based on your
> description, or more likely something more involved.
First of all, I experienced issues while not having OSC enabled during suspend/resume cycle. Am I right supposing that, if using oscillator to clock the codec, I have to keep it running during a suspend/resume cycle?
Is something like this sounds like an acceptable option or we need something more sophisticated?
@@ -481,7 +481,10 @@ static int wm8731_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
break;
case SND_SOC_BIAS_OFF:
snd_soc_write(codec, WM8731_ACTIVE, 0x0);
- snd_soc_write(codec, WM8731_PWR, 0xffff);
+ reg = 0xdf;
+ if (wm8731->sysclk_type == WM8731_SYSCLK_XTAL)
+ reg |= 1 << 0x5;
+ snd_soc_update_bits(codec, WM8731_PWR, 0x00ff, reg);
regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(wm8731->supplies),
wm8731->supplies);
break;
And, yes, there is only 8 bits dedicated to power down control in this register.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists