linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110701121408.GC28008@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:14:08 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to a
 header


* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:

> The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c
> files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's
> first move it into a header
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> Ingo, Thomas: Who needs to ack the x86 bit ? I'd like to send that
> to Linus asap with the powerpc fix.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

(btw., you can consider obvious cleanups as being implicitly acked by 
me and don't need to block fixes on me.)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/