linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309561866.14501.254.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:11:06 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to a
 header

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c
> > files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's
> > first move it into a header
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Ingo, Thomas: Who needs to ack the x86 bit ? I'd like to send that
> > to Linus asap with the powerpc fix.
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> (btw., you can consider obvious cleanups as being implicitly acked by 
> me and don't need to block fixes on me.)

Ok thanks !

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/