[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1107011043410.1988-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10 v6] PM / Domains: Don't stop wakeup devices during
system sleep transitions
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So the only way forward I can see is to add a special PM domain callback,
> say .active_wakeup(), that will return "true" if the device is to be left
> active if wakeup-enabled. So the check you don't like will become
> something like:
>
> if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && genpd->active_wakeup
> && genpd->active_wakeup(dev))
> return 0;
>
> Would that be better?
Another option, less flexible but perhaps easier to use, would be to
set a couple of bitflags indicating whether the device needs power or
clocks to handle wakeup signals.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists