[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107051421.02658.richard@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:21:02 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend v2] Fix infinite loop in search_binary_handler()
Am Dienstag 05 Juli 2011, 14:02:34 schrieb Tetsuo Handa:
> Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > But IMHO adding a new attribute to task_struct is a bit overkill.
> > Why is your variant better than my strcmp() in fs/exec.c?
>
> Say, there are multiple /sbin/modprobe
>
> /sbin/modprobe
> /var/chroot/sbin/modprobe
>
> and only /var/chroot/sbin/modprobe needs request_module() whereas
> /sbin/modprobe does not need request_module(). Why do we need to make
> execl("/sbin/modprobe", "--help", NULL) from chroot("/var/chroot/") fail
> by denying request_module() that does not cause recursion?
*headdesk*, bprm->filename will contain "/sbin/modprobe" and the strcmp()
will falsely match.
Thanks for the pointer!
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists