[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110705122405.GU3765@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:24:05 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip, final] perf, x86: Add hw_watchdog_set_attr() in a
sake of nmi-watchdog on P4
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:44:37PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Probably I miss something and you mean something completely different?
>
> What i am missing is that you have not pointed out the *core problem*
> you are fixing and it's not obvious from the changelog either!
Cyril,
I think you didn't explain the fact that without this patch if you enable
nmi_watchdog, then the 'perf' tool doesn't work on a P4. This is bad for
end users. It seems like with all the P4 register coupling an end user
can run either the nmi_watchdog _or_ perf but not both.
For RHEL-6 this was bad because we like to enable the nmi_watchdog.
This patch does some magic and allows the end user to use the nmi_watchdog
_and_ perf concurrently (a common expected behaviour).
I hope that clears things up Ingo.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists