linux-kernel - RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FFF198FBBF957F4393BA834040FEFFA2032F69@DFLE35.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:54:14 +0000
From:	"Grosen, Mark" <mgrosen@...com>
To:	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
CC:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	davinci-linux-open-source 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation

> From: Nori, Sekhar
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 10:30 PM

...
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/662941/
> >
> > Yes, I like this idea - much cleaner. For example, the start() method
> > becomes (pseudo-code):
> >
> > start()
> > {
> >     /* bootaddrreg derived from platform data */
> >     bootaddrreg = boot_address;
> >
> >     clk_enable();
> > }
> >
> > Referring to your patch above, would it be better to just pass
> > the flags into the davinci_psc_config() function rather than breaking
> out more
> > arguments for each flag?
> 
> I did dwell on this quite a bit while writing that
> patch, but finally decided on passing an argument
> instead since I was not sure if there are going
> to be more modifiers required.
> 
> Now that you have the need for one more flag, I
> think we should go ahead and pass the flags directly
> to davinci_psc_config(). My original patch is not
> upstream yet. I will re-spin it and you can build
> on top of it.

Thanks, Sekhar, this sounds good. I'll look for your patch and utilize
it in the next rev of this patch.

Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/