linux-kernel - RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FFF198FBBF957F4393BA834040FEFFA2032F6F@DFLE35.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:54:21 +0000
From:	"Grosen, Mark" <mgrosen@...com>
To:	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
CC:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	davinci-linux-open-source 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 5/8] remoteproc: add davinci implementation

> From: Nori, Sekhar
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 10:35 PM
> To: Grosen, Mark; Sergei Shtylyov

...
> > > Since procedure to set the boot address varies across DaVinci
> > > platforms, you could have a callback populated in platform data
> > > which will be implemented differently for original DaVinci and
> > > DA8xx devices.
> >
> > I looked at DM6467 and it's the same as OMAPL13x, except at a
> different
> > address. Rather than a callback, it could be just an address in the
> > platform data.
> 
> Sounds okay as long as _all_ the DaVinci devices have the same
> bit to be set. Plus, I hope there are no other users of the
> register so that there is no race with other platform code using
> the same register.

Sekhar,

The register is a dedicated 32-bit register that holds the start/boot
address for the DSP, so no other platform code should be using it. Once
the LRST is de-asserted (via the PSC code enhancement), the DSP starts
execution at the address in this register.

Thanks,

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/