[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E19ED0A.9000709@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:18:50 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: Simplify cpu_has_invlpg
On 07/10/2011 06:53 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Define CONFIG_X86_INVLPG for 64-bit too, which simplifies the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
I think a much better way to do this kind of stuff is to define
Linux-specific CPU feature bits (which we already have quite a few of).
That way they fall into the same mechanism as everything else that has
switches on CPU features, we can use alternatives, and so on.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists