lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110711015009.012a26d1@stein>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:50:09 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc:	Joel bourrigaud <joel@...rrigaud.info>,
	Bjørn Forbord <bforbord@...adpark.no>,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: ohci: do not bind to Pinnacle or Fujitsu HCI,
 prevent panic

On Jul 11 Stefan Richter wrote:
> This device with link layer PCI IDs 11bd:0015 and 1394 PHY IDs
> 00000e:086613 is apparently a Fujitsu MB86613 --- hence the PHY IDs.
> Therefore, blacklist the MB86613 too

On the other hand, maybe the original MB86613 does not exhibit the issue.
The Pinnacle device is combined with another device or function, hence not
identical with MB86613:

0c:07.0 Multimedia controller [0480]: Pinnacle Systems Inc. AV/DV Studio Capture Card [11bd:bede]
        Subsystem: Pinnacle Systems Inc. Device [11bd:0023]
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort+ <MAbort+ >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 64 (2000ns min, 4000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
        Region 0: Memory at fb7ff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

0c:07.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: Pinnacle Systems Inc. Device [11bd:0015] (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
        Subsystem: Pinnacle Systems Inc. Device [11bd:0023]
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 64 (8000ns min, 20000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
        Region 0: Memory at fb7fe800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
        Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
        Kernel modules: firewire-ohci

BTW, I dimly remember hear-say about Fujitsu controllers, particularly
because they are among the few (or the only ones?) that featured a
programmable PhysicalUpperBound.  So there was at least one Linux users who
had such a controller; perhaps as onboard controllers of a Fujitsu
notebook.  (Which has got a shorter service life expectancy than a PCI
card...)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-== -=== -=-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ