linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] signals: convert the X86_32 code to use set_current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110711103110.20018ac1@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:31:10 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signals: convert the X86_32 code to use
 set_current_blocked()

On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:27:27 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:

> sys_sigsuspend() and sys_sigreturn() change ->blocked directly.
> This is not correct, see the changelog in e6fa16ab
> "signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()"
> 
> Change them to use set_current_blocked().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/