linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:31:24 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant@...retlab.ca>,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered
> by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC
> device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the
> clocks it provides.

Sigh.  That sounds like yet more trash.  Obviously whoever thought
up that doesn't actually understand clks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/