[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110711020054.GE23038@dastard>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:00:54 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: raghu.prabhu13@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, keithp@...thp.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, riel@...hat.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove incorrect usage of sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:56:23AM +0530, raghu.prabhu13@...il.com wrote:
> From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>
>
> In shrinker functions, sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure variable is being used while
> trimming slab caches in general and not restricted to inode/dentry caches as
> documented for that sysctl.
>
> Raghavendra D Prabhu (1):
> mm/vmscan: Remove sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure from non-vfs shrinkers
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
That's the only questionable use of it as it has nothing to do with
filesystems.
> fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +-
> fs/gfs2/quota.c | 2 +-
> fs/mbcache.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/dir.c | 2 +-
> fs/quota/dquot.c | 3 +--
> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +-
All the others are filesystemâ‚‹specific caches and as such the use of
vfs_cache_pressure to adjust the balance of reclaim is valid usage.
Especially the VFS quota cache shrinkers. ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists