[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1AB3F7.2070600@dsn.okisemi.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:27:35 +0900
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com, qi.wang@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pch_gpio: Support interrupt function
Hi Grant,
(2011/07/05 14:52), Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> (2011/07/05 12:59), Grant Likely wrote:
>>> As we discussed before,
>>> without specifying PCH_IRQ_BASE,
>>> it seemed IRQ number collision issue occurred.
>>> Thus, I added PCH_IRQ_BASE.
>>
>> Then fix the irq collision. If the core code hands out an irq range
>> that is in-use by some other driver, then the other driver isn't
>> reserving it's irqs correctly and it needs to be fixed. Hacking
>> around the problem doesn't help anything in the long run.
>>
>
> I tried to work irq_alloc_descs with dynamic allocation.(Set 2nd
> parameter as 0).
> However it seems the issue remains to be seen.
> I attached dmesg output log, /proc/interrupts log and modified PCH-GPIO
> source code.
>
> Could you give me your opinion or information ?
>
> NOTE: I tested on linux-3.0-rc3
>
How is it going ?
--
tomoya
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists