[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107121146080.3937@router.home>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:47:53 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [slubllv7 06/17] slub: Add cmpxchg_double_slab()
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 12 juillet 2011 à 10:59 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>
> > We do not need to have _count included. This is just there because the
> > field is in the way on 64 bit and we can only do 2x 64 bit cmpxchges. On
> > 32 bi we can drop _count from "counters".
> >
>
> OK, thanks for clarification.
Still I'd like to get some ideas on how to make the whole thing much
cleaner. Isnt there some way to convert a struct to an unsigned long
without going through a union? And a way to convert a struct + 32 bit
atomic_t into a 64 bit unsigned long? Would simplify things significantly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists