[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1C952D.6010902@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:40:45 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [slubllv7 06/17] slub: Add cmpxchg_double_slab()
On 07/12/2011 09:47 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Le mardi 12 juillet 2011 à 10:59 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>>
>>> We do not need to have _count included. This is just there because the
>>> field is in the way on 64 bit and we can only do 2x 64 bit cmpxchges. On
>>> 32 bi we can drop _count from "counters".
>>
>> OK, thanks for clarification.
>
> Still I'd like to get some ideas on how to make the whole thing much
> cleaner. Isnt there some way to convert a struct to an unsigned long
> without going through a union? And a way to convert a struct + 32 bit
> atomic_t into a 64 bit unsigned long? Would simplify things significantly.
If you know it is in memory you can cast ("pun") the pointer.
If it's not in memory that can be inefficient, though.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists