[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1E510A.6010005@cuw.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:14:34 -0500
From: Greg Dietsche <gregory.dietsche@....edu>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: julia@...u.dk, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, npalix.work@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...u.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coccicheck: add parallel execution
On 07/12/2011 09:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 20:26 -0500, Greg Dietsche wrote:
>
>> For example to process 6 SmPL patches at the same time:
>> make coccicheck PARALLEL=6
>> Results are held in /tmp until the scripts finish. By doing this the
>> script is able to collate the results from each SmPL patch instead of
>> interleaving them in the output.
>>
> You might try adding support for gnu parallel instead.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
>
>
That is a very interesting and useful tool :) I'd never heard of it
before. The man page scares me a little bit - lots of options are marked
as "alpha testing," but the ones i tried seemed to work fine. Anyway,
without any modifications to Coccinelle, it is possible to do this:
ls scripts/coccinelle/*/*.cocci | parallel -j+0 make coccicheck COCCI={}
MODE=patch
it seems to behave mostly like my patch, but doesn't cleanup quite as
well if you decide to kill it with ctrl-c (it leaves instances of spatch
running). On the upside, it is up to 3 seconds faster than my patch
(because my patch waits 3 seconds before checking on the number of jobs
that are running).
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists