linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:17:24 -0700
From:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Allow disabling of CONFIG_DEVPORT

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:34:52PM -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
>> It would be useful to build kernels with disabled support of /dev/port
>> for systems where we do not want to allow an administrator to access IO
>> ports directly.
>>
>> To do so however, CONFIG_DEVPORT needs to be user-selectable.  Give this
>> configuration option a name and help description.
>>
>> Google-Bug-Id: 3177114
>
> What is that field?  It's not something that I've ever seen before...

This is for our internal reference.

>
> Please don't push internal fields like this to public patches, it only
> causes confusion...

It hasn't caused any problems so far.  It helps us track things as we
pull code back downstream.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/