[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110714153113.31ffdeea.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:31:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Allow disabling of sys_iopl, sys_ioperm
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:34:53 -0700
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <asm/syscalls.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYS_IOPL
> /*
> * this changes the io permissions bitmap in the current task.
> */
> @@ -111,3 +112,14 @@ long sys_iopl(unsigned int level, struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_SYS_IOPL */
> +
> +asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int turn_on) {
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +long sys_iopl(unsigned int level, struct pt_regs *regs) {
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_SYS_IOPL */
sys_iopl() is missing asmlinkage.
It would be far more conventional to use cond_syscall(). Perhaps by
adding a CONFIG_X86 area into kernel/sys_ni.c
fyi, I'm offering special deals on checkpatch.pl site licenses this month.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists