linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:38:55 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	'Stephen Rothwell' <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	'Russell King' <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Jaecheol Lee' <jc.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Hi Russell,
> 
Hi Russell and Stephen,

> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:04:41 +0100 Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > BTW, Russell, commit 29cb3cd208dd above changed the return type of
> > > exynos4_cpu_suspend() from void to int but did not add any return
> > > statement ...
> >
> > That's fine - it ends with a call to panic() which is declared as a
> > function which never returns.  Therefore, exynos4_cpu_suspend() itself
> > never returns.
> 
> Ah, yes.  Unfortunately, the s5p tree changes removed the panic.  So, I
> guess the merge needs some other fixup.
> 
Oops, yes. I fixed it and thanks a lot for pointing out.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/