linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110720182540.c53726975c8a0b3a48d609b1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:25:40 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jaecheol Lee <jc.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree

Hi Russell,

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:04:41 +0100 Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > BTW, Russell, commit 29cb3cd208dd above changed the return type of
> > exynos4_cpu_suspend() from void to int but did not add any return
> > statement ...
> 
> That's fine - it ends with a call to panic() which is declared as a
> function which never returns.  Therefore, exynos4_cpu_suspend() itself
> never returns.

Ah, yes.  Unfortunately, the s5p tree changes removed the panic.  So, I
guess the merge needs some other fixup.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped