[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110720194915.GA26043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:49:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Erik Gilling <konkers@...roid.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/dt: tegra devicetree support
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:47:58PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Sure, the tegra-wm8903 property can be dropped. If we start to see a
> really well established pattern of the tegra paired with a wm8903,
> then at that point we can define a compatible property for it and
> document exactly what it means (document the boundaries and
> assumptions that the compatible value requires).
There is actually such a pattern, for various reasons a huge proportion
of Tegra systems are straight clones of the reference designs and the
reference designs mostly used WM8903.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists