linux-kernel - Re: OLPC power management patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110724102337.6efffea7@queued.net>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:23:37 -0700
From:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: OLPC power management patches - merge for 3.1?

On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:13:23 -0700
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
[...]
> > or
> > 
> > depends on POWER_SUPPLY
> > select POWER_SUPPLY
> > 
> > ?
> 
> You can't do both of those AFAIK -- and it already depends on
> POWER_SUPPLY. I guess you could remove "depends on POWER_SUPPLY" and
> add "select POWER_SUPPLY". I'll see if that works.
> 


Yeah, select appears to be the only option so long as bool stuff in
arch/ depends upon tristate stuff in drivers/.  It'd be nice to get the
OLPC PM code to be modular, but getting it upstream (the code is from
2007 or 2008!) is a nice first step.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/