[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E2CC489.1090509@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:19:05 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, avi@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
On 07/24/2011 03:37 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please consider pulling from
>
> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git
> kvm-tool-for-linus
>
> to merge the Native Linux KVM tool to Linux 3.1.
>
> [ The changes to 9p headers were already merged but show up in the pull
> request. ]
>
> The goal of this tool is to provide a clean, from-scratch, lightweight
> KVM host
> tool implementation that can boot Linux guest images with no BIOS
> dependencies
> and with only the minimal amount of legacy device emulation. The primary
> focus
> of the tool is to Linux but there are already people on working on
> supporting
> GRUB and other operating systems.
lguest already does this and lives in the kernel.
So purely from a kernel perspective, why have two tools in the tree that
do the same thing? Shouldn't you at least unify the userspace with the
lguest userspace?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists