linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOJsxLH-poY4-wEUPqAa8bzK+1WJ0UYtSuue72RYwcd_D0kx_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:27:06 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, avi@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
	asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1

Hi Anthony,

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws> wrote:
> lguest already does this and lives in the kernel.

Does Lguest have SMP, usermode networking, and GUI support?

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws> wrote:
> So purely from a kernel perspective, why have two tools in the tree that do
> the same thing?  Shouldn't you at least unify the userspace with the lguest
> userspace?

Are you talking about Documentation/lguest/lguest.c? How would you
suggest we unify our code with that?

                                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/