[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110725103517.GL28787@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:35:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
* Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 25.07.2011, at 12:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> So it was a no brainer for me to pull it into -tip.
> >>
> >> The thing I don't agree with is that it should live in the
> >> kernel tree.
> >
> > FYI, tools/kvm/ *already* lives in the kernel tree - that is how
> > it's developed and used and it also shares code with the kernel.
>
> So you're just trying to make this a self-fulfilling prophecy now?
No, i'm just trying to point out to you that it's already a fact that
the tool already lives in a kernel tree and was developed there to
the tune of 700+ commits within a few short months.
IMO you should not be arguing:
'You should do X because that's my preference.'
IMO you should be arguing:
'You should do X because technical advantage Y which is important to the project.'
We have listed numerous technical advantages of why we have chosen
tools/kvm/ - and you have not countered that with any convincing
technical disadvantage so far.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists