[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110725112412.GA1429@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:12 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
avi@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com, asias.hejun@...il.com,
prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:08:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Fact is that developing ABIs within an integrated project is
> *amazingly* powerful. You should try it one day, instead of
> criticizing it :-)
I've been doing this long before you declare it the rosetta stone. Some
of the worst ABIs I know come from that kind of development, e.g. all
the ioctls we have in xfs, inherited from the "tightly integrated" IRIX
development cycle.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists