[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110725113258.GA26133@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:32:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
avi@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com, asias.hejun@...il.com,
prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:08:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Fact is that developing ABIs within an integrated project is
> > *amazingly* powerful. You should try it one day, instead of
> > criticizing it :-)
>
> I've been doing this long before you declare it the rosetta stone.
> Some of the worst ABIs I know come from that kind of development,
> e.g. all the ioctls we have in xfs, inherited from the "tightly
> integrated" IRIX development cycle.
As i said it's not a guarantee, you can mess up even under the best
of circumstances.
Also, arguably a filesystem is constrainted wrt. ABIs: it's just one
filesystem which pretty much pushes it towards ioctls which in turn
is often an unstructured breeding ground for mess.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists