[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1311666670.17766.241.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:51:10 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iscsi-target merge for v3.1-rc1
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:09:40 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Just a simple
> >
> > #define DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ll,d) \
> > ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)-1; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
> >
> > looks like it would work and be simpler. Avoid the conditional, do the
> > same "add 'd-1' thing as the regular ROUND_UP().
> >
>
> We might end up needing a DIV_ROUND_UP_SECTOR_T because that guy's
> type/size is Kconfigurable.
>
> otoh DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL won't have many callsites - the occasional
> conversion from UL to ULL then back to UL wouldn't kill us. Unless
> there be subtle problems with such a conversion.
>
Makes sense to me, and sending out updated series.. Anything else to
consider here folks before pushing into target-pending.git/for-next..?
Thanks!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists