[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1311667641.17766.249.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:07:21 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel.h: Add DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL usage
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 00:53 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:10 +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Add new DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL macro usage for 32-bit architectures requiring
> > unsigned long long division of sectors * dev_max_sectors.
> []
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> []
> > +#define DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ll,d) \
> > + ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)-1; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
>
> Maybe use uint64_t and a temporary for d?
>
> #define DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ll, d) \
> ({ \
> typeof(d) _d = d; \
> uint64_t _tmp = (uint64_t)(ll) + _d - 1; \
> do_div(_tmp, _d); \
> _tmp; \
> })
>
>
Hi Joe,
Not sure on this one myself.. Would this case ever be strictly required
for proper 32-bit operation with unsigned long long division with
sector_t..?
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists