linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1311683732.3526.64.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:35:32 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +       /* For anything but wake ups, just return the task_cpu */
> > +       if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE || sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_FORK) 
> 
> So we call select_task_rq() with SD_BALANCE_{WAKE,EXEC,FORK}, 
> 
> 	(WAKE != WAKE -> 0 || WAKE != FORK -> 1) -> 1
> 	(EXEC != WAKE -> 1 ) -> 1
> 	(FORK != WAKE -> 1 ) -> 1
> 
> IOW, you never end up doing anything now.. surely you didn't mean that?!

Bah!

s/||/&&/

:-p

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/