| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4E2F3D94.4000401@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:20:04 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> CC: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] On 07/26/2011 02:49 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote: >> it passes test with my x86 64bits setups. > > Great, thanks for testing. > >> looks like tip/master does not include tip/x86/memblock and tip/x86/mm yet. >> >> So tip/x86/memblock, tip/x86/mm will not get into 3.1? > > Yeah, I think the whole thing including the last patchset was a bit > too late for this merge window. These are basically cleanups and > could possibly cause weird boot regressions, so having enough time in > -tip before going mainline seems like a good idea to me. > It seems a bit scary, so holding this until 3.2 would definitely be my preference. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists