linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:49:59 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[]

Hello,

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> it passes test with my x86 64bits setups.

Great, thanks for testing.

> looks like tip/master does not include tip/x86/memblock and tip/x86/mm yet.
>
> So tip/x86/memblock, tip/x86/mm will not get into 3.1?

Yeah, I think the whole thing including the last patchset was a bit
too late for this merge window.  These are basically cleanups and
could possibly cause weird boot regressions, so having enough time in
-tip before going mainline seems like a good idea to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/