[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YPZLvXKHdy4nSeqNhk71o5hy-o6XQKbohvuUsGMMMirOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:49:59 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[]
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> it passes test with my x86 64bits setups.
Great, thanks for testing.
> looks like tip/master does not include tip/x86/memblock and tip/x86/mm yet.
>
> So tip/x86/memblock, tip/x86/mm will not get into 3.1?
Yeah, I think the whole thing including the last patchset was a bit
too late for this merge window. These are basically cleanups and
could possibly cause weird boot regressions, so having enough time in
-tip before going mainline seems like a good idea to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists