[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871uxcr2kd.fsf@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:26:42 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> writes:
> Some of the entry points to pm runtime are not safe to
> call in atomic context unless pm_runtime_irq_safe() has
> been called. Inspecting the code, it is not immediately
> obvious that the functions sleep at all, as they run
> inside a spin_lock_irqsave, but under some conditions
> they can drop the lock and turn on irqs.
>
> If a driver incorrectly calls the pm_runtime apis, it can
> cause sleeping and irq processing when it expects to stay
> in atomic context.
>
> Add might_sleep_if to all the __pm_runtime_* entry points
> to enforce correct usage.
Minor: s/all/most of/, or something similar since in v2, it doesn't
annotate all of the functions anymore, just the main ones likely to be
(mis)used by drivers.
Other than that, looks good...
> Add pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend to the list of
> functions that can be called in atomic context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists