[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110727153731.GA19477@aftab>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:37:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:30:56AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 09:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, actually the idea is to patch the kernel only this one time
> > > and never ever be needing to do this for future CPUs, for this
> > > matter.
> >
> > But the check you have added turns this workaround on for all family
> > 0x15 CPUs. If a family 0x15 CPU is built with a larger or more
> > associative cache, one that does not need the workaround, we would
> > still turn on the workaround.
>
> Similarly, if family 0x21 CPUs have a similar arrangement (with
> identical or different cache sizes and associativity) the hardcoded
> check will fail.
So, in short, I$ design is the same for all F15h processors so a family
0x15 check suffices here.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists