| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110727214935.063242403FF@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: mszeredi@...e.cz, gurudas.pai@...cle.com, hughd@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...e.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: [PATCH] [95/99] mm: prevent concurrent unmap_mapping_range() on the same
2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
commit 2aa15890f3c191326678f1bd68af61ec6b8753ec upstream.
Michael Leun reported that running parallel opens on a fuse filesystem
can trigger a "kernel BUG at mm/truncate.c:475"
Gurudas Pai reported the same bug on NFS.
The reason is, unmap_mapping_range() is not prepared for more than
one concurrent invocation per inode. For example:
thread1: going through a big range, stops in the middle of a vma and
stores the restart address in vm_truncate_count.
thread2: comes in with a small (e.g. single page) unmap request on
the same vma, somewhere before restart_address, finds that the
vma was already unmapped up to the restart address and happily
returns without doing anything.
Another scenario would be two big unmap requests, both having to
restart the unmapping and each one setting vm_truncate_count to its
own value. This could go on forever without any of them being able to
finish.
Truncate and hole punching already serialize with i_mutex. Other
callers of unmap_mapping_range() do not, and it's difficult to get
i_mutex protection for all callers. In particular ->d_revalidate(),
which calls invalidate_inode_pages2_range() in fuse, may be called
with or without i_mutex.
This patch adds a new mutex to 'struct address_space' to prevent
running multiple concurrent unmap_mapping_range() on the same mapping.
[ We'll hopefully get rid of all this with the upcoming mm
preemptibility series by Peter Zijlstra, the "mm: Remove i_mmap_mutex
lockbreak" patch in particular. But that is for 2.6.39 ]
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Reported-by: Michael Leun <lkml20101129@...ton.leun.net>
Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
fs/nilfs2/btnode.c | 13 -------------
fs/nilfs2/btnode.h | 1 -
fs/nilfs2/super.c | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
mm/memory.c | 2 ++
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/inode.c
@@ -245,6 +245,20 @@ void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, (inode));
}
+void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ memset(mapping, 0, sizeof(*mapping));
+ INIT_RADIX_TREE(&mapping->page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ spin_lock_init(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mapping->private_list);
+ spin_lock_init(&mapping->private_lock);
+ INIT_RAW_PRIO_TREE_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear);
+ mutex_init(&mapping->unmap_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(address_space_init_once);
+
/*
* These are initializations that only need to be done
* once, because the fields are idempotent across use
@@ -256,13 +270,7 @@ void inode_init_once(struct inode *inode
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&inode->i_hash);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_devices);
- INIT_RADIX_TREE(&inode->i_data.page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
- spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.i_mmap_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_data.private_list);
- spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.private_lock);
- INIT_RAW_PRIO_TREE_ROOT(&inode->i_data.i_mmap);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_data.i_mmap_nonlinear);
+ address_space_init_once(&inode->i_data);
i_size_ordered_init(inode);
#ifdef CONFIG_INOTIFY
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->inotify_watches);
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/btnode.c
@@ -35,19 +35,6 @@
#include "btnode.h"
-void nilfs_btnode_cache_init_once(struct address_space *btnc)
-{
- memset(btnc, 0, sizeof(*btnc));
- INIT_RADIX_TREE(&btnc->page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
- spin_lock_init(&btnc->tree_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&btnc->private_list);
- spin_lock_init(&btnc->private_lock);
-
- spin_lock_init(&btnc->i_mmap_lock);
- INIT_RAW_PRIO_TREE_ROOT(&btnc->i_mmap);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&btnc->i_mmap_nonlinear);
-}
-
static const struct address_space_operations def_btnode_aops = {
.sync_page = block_sync_page,
};
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/btnode.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/nilfs2/btnode.h
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/btnode.h
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ struct nilfs_btnode_chkey_ctxt {
struct buffer_head *newbh;
};
-void nilfs_btnode_cache_init_once(struct address_space *);
void nilfs_btnode_cache_init(struct address_space *, struct backing_dev_info *);
void nilfs_btnode_cache_clear(struct address_space *);
struct buffer_head *nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc,
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/fs/nilfs2/super.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/fs/nilfs2/super.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static void nilfs_inode_init_once(void *
#ifdef CONFIG_NILFS_XATTR
init_rwsem(&ii->xattr_sem);
#endif
- nilfs_btnode_cache_init_once(&ii->i_btnode_cache);
+ address_space_init_once(&ii->i_btnode_cache);
ii->i_bmap = (struct nilfs_bmap *)&ii->i_bmap_union;
inode_init_once(&ii->vfs_inode);
}
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -639,6 +639,7 @@ struct address_space {
spinlock_t private_lock; /* for use by the address_space */
struct list_head private_list; /* ditto */
struct address_space *assoc_mapping; /* ditto */
+ struct mutex unmap_mutex; /* to protect unmapping */
} __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
/*
* On most architectures that alignment is already the case; but
@@ -2160,6 +2161,7 @@ extern loff_t vfs_llseek(struct file *fi
extern int inode_init_always(struct super_block *, struct inode *);
extern void inode_init_once(struct inode *);
+extern void address_space_init_once(struct address_space *mapping);
extern void inode_add_to_lists(struct super_block *, struct inode *);
extern void iput(struct inode *);
extern struct inode * igrab(struct inode *);
Index: linux-2.6.35.y/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/mm/memory.c
@@ -2573,6 +2573,7 @@ void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_
details.last_index = ULONG_MAX;
details.i_mmap_lock = &mapping->i_mmap_lock;
+ mutex_lock(&mapping->unmap_mutex);
spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
/* Protect against endless unmapping loops */
@@ -2589,6 +2590,7 @@ void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear)))
unmap_mapping_range_list(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear, &details);
spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&mapping->unmap_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unmap_mapping_range);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists