[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311855171.2617.170.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:12:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] trace: Add tracepoints to IRQ work run handler
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 11:57 -0700, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
> {
> struct irq_work *list;
>
> + trace_irq_work_run_entry(0);
> if (this_cpu_read(irq_work_list) == NULL)
> return;
>
> @@ -149,6 +151,7 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
> next_flags(NULL, IRQ_WORK_BUSY),
> NULL);
> }
> + trace_irq_work_run_exit(0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_run);
So what happens when we call irq_work_run() from the timer interrupt?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists