[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311927650.5890.217.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:20:50 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove WAKEUP_PREEMPT feature check in
 entity_tick
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:18 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > Nah, if there is 1 runnable task it will always run, preemption simply
> > doesn't matter. There's nothing to preempt it with.
> 
> Hmmm, so the newly waked task could be scheduled a little later.
> That means schedule tick judge everything. 
Oh, are you referring to the case where a task gets woken on an idle
remote cpu?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
