[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729082313.GA1843@barrios-desktop>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:23:13 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Prevent LRU churning
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:16:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:04:33 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Test result is following as.
> >
> > 1) Elapased time 10GB file decompressed.
> > Old inorder inorder + pagevec flush[10/10]
> > 01:47:50.88 01:43:16.16 01:40:27.18
> >
> > 2) failure of inorder lru
> > For test, it isolated 375756 pages. Only 45875 pages(12%) are put backed to
> > out-of-order(ie, head of LRU) Others, 329963 pages(88%) are put backed to in-order
> > (ie, position of old page in LRU).
>
> I'm getting more and more worried about how complex MM is becoming and
> this patchset doesn't take us in a helpful direction :(
Hmm. I think it's not too complicated stuff. :(
But I understand your concern enoughly.
>
> But it's hard to argue with numbers like that. Please respin patches 6-10?
Of course, but it would be rather late due to my business and other interesting features.
I will try to get a new data point in next version.
Thanks, Andrew.
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists