linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Fixed bug in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE Macro in dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFbHwiS9ESqXbHF8EnfMaMdR3JNCW+sPEtaAJvL0ptBY1OsFkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:07:09 +0100
From:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
To:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc:	Shashidhar Hiremath <shashidharh@...avyalabs.com>,
	Will Newton <will.newton@...tec.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Fixed bug in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE Macro in dw_mmc.c

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com> wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 12:03 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath wrote:
>> The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's] width to be 14 bits,
>> it is actually of 13 bits, Modified masks used in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE such that
>> they use only 13 bits instead of current 14.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shashidhar Hiremath <shashidharh@...avyalabs.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 77f0b6b..f13bb49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>>
>>       u32             des1;   /* Buffer sizes */
>>  #define IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(d, s) \
>> -     ((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & 0x03ffc000) | ((s) & 0x3fff))
>> +     ((d)->des1 = ((d)->des1 & 0x03ffe000) | ((s) & 0x1fff))
>>
>>       u32             des2;   /* buffer 1 physical address */
>>
>
> Yes, according to the TRM you appear to be correct
>
> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>

Yes, looks correct to me too (for some reason I didn't get the original mail).

Acked-by: Will Newton <will.newton@...tec.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/