linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Fixed bug in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE Macro in dw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2ei19ckpf.fsf@bob.laptop.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:53:00 -0400
From:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
Cc:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Shashidhar Hiremath <shashidharh@...avyalabs.com>,
	Will Newton <will.newton@...tec.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Fixed bug in IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE Macro in dw_mmc.c

Hi Shashidhar,

On Fri, Jul 29 2011, Will Newton wrote:
>>> The mask used inside this macro was assuming Buffer_Size1's[BS1's]
>>> width to be 14 bits,
>>> it is actually of 13 bits, Modified masks used in
>>> IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE such that
>>> they use only 13 bits instead of current 14.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shashidhar Hiremath <shashidharh@...avyalabs.com>
>
> Yes, looks correct to me too (for some reason I didn't get the original mail).
>
> Acked-by: Will Newton <will.newton@...tec.com>

Pushed to mmc-next for 3.1, thanks.

(I didn't get the original mail either; it looks like the mailing lists
rejected it for some reason.)

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@...top.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/