[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729003703.GM8006@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:37:03 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: matsumur@....ricoh.co.jp
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, cjb@...top.org,
daniel.manrique@...onical.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, manoj.iyer@...onical.com,
stable@...nel.org, tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [9/50] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:27:56AM +0900, matsumur@....ricoh.co.jp wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> Ricoh 1180:e823 device is named R5U220/R5U232 (2 devices have the same
> device ID ).
> So, I think it should be declared to as PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5U220.
Is that just the wrong name or will it actually cause misfunction?
I will keep it if it's just the wrong name, but the name should be probably
fixed upstream.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists