linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [9/50] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF239A906D.A39CC1D2-ON492578DC.0003E8BE-492578DC.0004121C@mta.ricoh.co.jp>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:46:20 +0900
From:	matsumur@....ricoh.co.jp
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	ak@...ux.intel.com, andi@...stfloor.org, cjb@...top.org,
	daniel.manrique@...onical.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, manoj.iyer@...onical.com,
	stable@...nel.org, tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [9/50] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock

It's no misfunction. Just the wrong name.

Koji Matsumuro

Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote on 2011/07/29 09:37:03:

> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:27:56AM +0900, matsumur@....ricoh.co.jp wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > Ricoh 1180:e823 device is named R5U220/R5U232 (2 devices have the same
> > device ID ).
> > So, I think it should be declared to as PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5U220.

> Is that just the wrong name or will it actually cause misfunction?

> I will keep it if it's just the wrong name, but the name should be
probably
> fixed upstream.

> -Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/