[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E34548F.9040909@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:59:27 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, kconfig: Default to ARCH=x86 to avoid overriding
CONFIG_64BIT
On 07/30/2011 09:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
> well, from my point of view, it do not need to be updated. Your patch
> corrupt SUBARCH's purpose, that is:
>
> # SUBARCH tells the usermode build what the underlying arch is.
>
For klibc integration, we ran into this problem as well: the set of
architectures for the kernel simply isn't the same set as the
architectures for userspace. For the kernel, x86 is an architecture,
for userspace the architectures are x86_64 or i386 and they are
fundamentally different in many, many ways.
The main problem with SUBARCH is that it is ill-defined in the general
case if SUBARCH contains a user space or a kernel space architecture.
In that sense I would much prefer it if was called, say, USERARCH and
was always available. It could even be set by Kconfig (CONFIG_USERARCH?)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists