linux-kernel - Re: [patch] w1: off by one in w1_f29_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110730085131.GE5575@shale.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:51:31 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc:	Jean-François Dagenais 
	<jeff.dagenais@...il.com>, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] w1: off by one in w1_f29_remove_slave()

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42:29AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> Is there any reason to release the data "backwards" ?
> The default way is to go upwards. that looks more readable.

I considered doing it that way.  It would work.  I throught maybe
they were going to add something where it needed to be unwound LIFO
order.

I'll wait for Jean-Françoisto say which way is prefered.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/