linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/18] dmaengine/amba-pl08x: Remove redundant comment and rewrite original

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOh2x=nMK+fFUHd_JTFZg8HwFGKi+FbpzP-o94hcNa64Hj47bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:51:38 -0700
From:	viresh kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	pratyush.anand@...com, rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com,
	bhupesh.sharma@...com, shiraz.hashim@...com,
	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vipin.kumar@...com, armando.visconti@...com, amit.virdi@...com,
	vipulkumar.samar@...com, deepak.sikri@...com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] dmaengine/amba-pl08x: Remove redundant comment and
 rewrite original

On 7/30/11, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> 2011/7/31 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>:
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:32:55AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> The PL08x has two bus mastering interfaces. They can be
>>> connected to two separate busses and two adress spaces
>>> even, usually that is not the case though.
>>
>> This is not what the function is about... that's done by my
>> pl08x_select_bus() function.
>
> To be clear, I was explaining what I percieved as a
> question from Viresh about what the comment in this hunk of
> the patch was about:
>

Just to clear my question again:
- It wasn't about the comment but concept behind Master/Slave terminology.
- Why are we referring src and dest as Master and Slave. As there is
nothing like that.
- As pointed by Russell and me earlier: Probably it is for choosing
the victim for
reduction of width, in case src and dest addresses are misaligned to each other.

If what i understood is correct, then we should get rid of this
routine or this master/slave
terminology, as this is causing confusion.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/