[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110802185501.GG6399@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:55:01 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp, horms@...ge.net.au,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 03/10] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:08:07AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> #On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 16:36 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:55:07PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > > From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with
> > > the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header
> > > in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. To pass the size with this
> > > patch the syntax of the kernel parameter is extended as follows:
> > >
> > > elfcorehdr=[size[KMG]@]offset[KMG]
> > >
> > > This change is backward compatible because elfcorehdr=size is still allowed.
> >
> > Generally vmcore parses elfcorehdr to figure out the sizes. kexec-tools
> > knows about it and relevant memory is excluded from second kernel's map
> > with the help of memmap= command line option.
> >
> > Can you please mention that this is only s390 specific requirement as
> > there are no memmap= equivalent options and somehow dump tools wants
> > to know how big the elf header size is?
>
> I updated the description:
>
> Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with
> the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header
> in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. Current kdump architecture
> backends use different methods to do that, e.g. x86 uses the memmap= kernel
> parameter. On s390 there is no easy way to transfer this information.
> Therefore the elfcorehdr kernel parameter is extended to also pass the size.
> This now can also be used as standard mechanism by all future kdump
> architecture backends.
>
> The syntax of the kernel parameter is extended as follows:
>
> elfcorehdr=[size[KMG]@]offset[KMG]
>
> This change is backward compatible because elfcorehdr=size is still allowed.
>
> Ok?
Yes, this one looks ok.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists