[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110803182826.GB2865@albatros>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:28:26 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] shm: optimize exit_shm()
We may check .in_use == 0 without holding the rw_mutex as .in_use is int
and reads of ints are atomic. As .in_use may be changed to zero while current
process was sleeping in down_write(), we should check .in_use once again after
down_write().
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
---
ipc/shm.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 4e3c883..855ddc0 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ void exit_shm(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct ipc_namespace *ns = task->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
+ if (shm_ids(ns).in_use == 0)
+ return;
+
/* Destroy all already created segments, but not mapped yet */
down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
if (shm_ids(ns).in_use)
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists